While to many people it may seem like an absurd thing to be joyful about, for me one of the joys of traveling to other countries is not having to worry about HFCS. Whereas in the US, i order diet soda because of the presence of High Fructose Corn Syrup in almost all non-diet varieties, in most of countries you can recklessly order regular soda! It's lovely!
The sad thing, though, is that this joy may be fleeting... Due to the wonders of capitalism and globalization, HFCS is making its way into foreign markets, perniciously slinking in like a pestilence. With different names for HFCS depending on the country, scrutinizing labels while on international travel will not only become necessary as this trend continues but will also pose some difficulties. Whether it's called Isoglucose or Glucose Fructose Syrup or some other variety, HFCS is rearing its ugly head in other markets. Just as a sad example, while on the plane back to the US, i checked the label on the jam packet served with the bread during the breakfast "meal." The jam was of French origin (not Kraft or Smuckers or some American crap). No worries then, right? HFCS in French jam? No way.
Yes, way. It was there, listed as Sirop de Fructose-Glucose.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
Sugar and HFCS: comparing the manufacturing processes
Tate & Lyle, a UK-based ingredient manufacturer, includes in its portfolio of manufactured goods a wide-range of sweeteners (apparently some of its sugar brands have recently been acquired by American Sugar Refining.) On the Tate & Lyle website there's a wealth of information about its products, including High Fructose Corn Syrup, cane sugar, as well as what they term "high-intensity sweeteners," such as Splenda. Tate & Lyle's informative descriptions and diagrams of the manufacturing process of their sweeteners are very useful for those of us trying to understand the fundamental differences between HFCS and sugar.
What does Tate & Lyle tell us about HFCS?
Well, first of all, HFCS and cane sugar, while comprised of the same basic compounds, differ fundamentally in how they are processed. Tate & Lyle states:
Secondly, "Is High Fructose Corn Syrup Genetically Modified?"
That scares me.
Ok, lastly, let's take the diagram of the process involved in cane sugar refining and compare it to the process for wet-milling corn.
What does this comparison show? Well, as complex as both sets of processes are, only the HFCS chart contains a node where "further processing" occurs.
While I have my own conclusions, I welcome insights about how refined cane sugar products differ from refined corn products.
What does Tate & Lyle tell us about HFCS?
Well, first of all, HFCS and cane sugar, while comprised of the same basic compounds, differ fundamentally in how they are processed. Tate & Lyle states:
Although High Fructose Corn Syrup is essentially comprised of the same compounds as sucrose, namely glucose and fructose, unlike sucrose, which is usually refined from sugar cane, the raw material of HFCS (corn), must undergo a great deal of processing to create HFCS.So, although chemically speaking, the compounds are similar, the "great deal of processing" required to create HFCS differentiates HFCS from cane sugar.
Secondly, "Is High Fructose Corn Syrup Genetically Modified?"
Those concerned with the consumption of GM foods have expressed concern with regards to HFCS, as GM corn is often the source of this product. Whilst it is true that HFCS is produced from genetically modified corn, corn starch extracted from the corn undergoes so much processing, and the products of the processes are so removed from corn that there is no detectable corn DNA present in HFCS. This means that HFCS itself contains no genetically modified material.So, that means, IF HFCS were not so extremely processed, it would contain Genically Modified material; because it undergoes such an extreme amount of processing that the very DNA of the genetically modified corn that goes into HFCS is no longer detectable. That's supposed to make us feel good about HFCS? It is so damned processed that the initial substance is processed right out of the ultimate product.
That scares me.
Ok, lastly, let's take the diagram of the process involved in cane sugar refining and compare it to the process for wet-milling corn.
What does this comparison show? Well, as complex as both sets of processes are, only the HFCS chart contains a node where "further processing" occurs.
While I have my own conclusions, I welcome insights about how refined cane sugar products differ from refined corn products.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
The Corn Refining Process (step-by-step)
The below page (source) is just too good not to post.
In my view, it doesn't even need much editorializing... nothing artificial about this process.... noooooooooooooo..... it's all natural....... that's au naturel to you....
yep........
mmhmmm......
Return home...
In my view, it doesn't even need much editorializing... nothing artificial about this process.... noooooooooooooo..... it's all natural....... that's au naturel to you....
yep........
mmhmmm......
you betcha'
| |
| Refinery staff inspect arriving corn shipments and clean them twice to remove cob, dust, chaff and foreign materials before steeping, the first processing step, begins. Corn refining has been the fastest growing market for U.S. agriculture over the past twenty years, and refiners now use around 16% of the $21 billion U.S. corn crop. Since a large amount of the nations' corn production never leaves the farm on which it was produced, corn refining is a vital factor in the cash market for U.S. corn. Each day the production of about 33 thousand acres of corn arrives at corn refining facilities before conversion to food, industrial and feed products. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Copyright © The Corn Refiners Association, 2007
Direct all questions to: Contact CRA
Direct all questions to: Contact CRA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

